Show, Don't Tell: What It Really Means, with Before-and-After Examples

The advice turns up in every workshop, every margin note, every writing group thread: show, don't tell. It is useful. It is also one of the most badly explained rules in writing, which is why so many drafts swing from flat summary to a kind of jittery over-acting — every character sighing, every room described down to the third chair. What the rule is really about is evidence. Give readers something to watch and they will draw their own conclusions. Hand them the conclusion and there is nothing to watch at all.

What showing and telling actually are

Telling states. Showing enacts. Told: Hannah was exhausted. Shown: Hannah read the same line of the email three times and still couldn't say what it meant. The second version never uses the word exhausted, and that is exactly why it lands. A conclusion a reader reaches themselves feels like knowledge. One they are handed feels like information.

Two clarifications worth making early, because they prevent most of the damage.

Showing is not withholding. Some writers take the advice to mean they should hide the important thing and let readers guess. That is a different technique, and it only works when the reader has enough to work with. If a scene is built entirely from meaningful glances and unspoken feelings, you have not shown anything — you have simply refused to say it.

Nor is showing about length. A single line of dialogue can show more than three descriptive paragraphs. Showing means the information arrives through action, detail, speech or physical reaction rather than through a label.

Before and after

Here is a piece of telling that is doing its job badly. It is clear, it is grammatical, and it gives the reader nothing to hold.

Daniel was anxious about the interview. He had always been anxious in situations like this, ever since school, and he knew it would probably ruin his chances. He tried to calm down.

Now the same information, delivered as evidence.

Daniel read the address again. He had written it on the back of his hand, and the ink had smudged. At the door he checked his collar, then checked it again, and when the receptionist asked his name he gave the one he had practised, slowly, as if it belonged to someone else.

Nothing has been added to the plot. But the reader now knows Daniel is anxious without being told, and knows something else besides: that he has rehearsed this, that he expects to be found out. That second layer is the real reward of showing. It lets a scene carry more than one thing at once.

The same move works for emotion that a character is trying not to feel. Priya missed her grandmother is a summary. Priya still dialled her grandmother's number on the second Thursday of the month, then put the phone down before the ringing started is a person.

When telling beats showing

Telling is not failure. It is the connective tissue that holds scenes together, and a manuscript that shows everything is unreadable. Telling earns its place in several specific situations:

• Compressing time. Three years passed is honest and efficient. Nobody needs those three years dramatised.
• Moving characters around. Journeys, errands and logistics rarely change anything. Summarise and get to the room where it matters.
• Facts the reader needs and nobody would dramatise. A character's job, who is related to whom, how the town makes its money. Deliver it plainly and move on.
• Pace. Before a tense scene, a brisk paragraph of telling gets everyone in position. Afterwards, a summary lets the reader breathe and the next scene start.
• Voice. A narrator who tells can be a deliberate pleasure — wry, opinionated, gossipy, intimate. Plenty of much-loved fiction is narrated by a voice that comments rather than performs.

Notice how many of those are about rhythm. Showing slows a story down; telling speeds it up. The skill is choosing which parts of your story deserve to be slow.

How to tell well when you do tell

Weak telling is vague and general. Strong telling is specific, opinionated and delivered with confidence.

He was a bully is a label. He was a bully with beautiful manners is a person, and it took three extra words. The village was dying is a mood. The village had been fading for years: the post office closed, then the school, then the bus is a place with a history in it.

That is the test. If a telling sentence contains a concrete noun, a number, a name or a judgement sharp enough to argue with, it is pulling its weight. If it contains only abstractions, cut it or replace it with a moment.

Turning a telling line into a showing moment

1. Find the label. Highlight every sentence that names a feeling, a personality trait or a judgement: she was furious, he was charming, they were poor.
2. Ask what a camera would catch. Not what the character feels — what a stranger in the room would see or hear.
3. Choose one or two details. Two is usually enough. Four is a description; two is a clue.
4. Delete the label. Trust the details to do the work. If the scene still reads clearly, you have shown it.
5. Read it aloud. If you would need to explain the moment to a friend, it is not yet on the page.

The over-showing trap

Once writers discover showing, they often apply it everywhere, and the result is as flat as the telling was — just slower.

Watch for characters who cannot speak without shrugging, nodding, sighing, swallowing or running a hand through their hair. Watch for weather used as a stand-in for feeling: rain for grief, sun for hope. Watch for scenery described in detail that no one will remember, in a scene where nothing changes. And watch for withheld information held back so long that the reader stops being intrigued and starts being annoyed.

A workable rule: show the moments that change something — a decision, a relationship, a piece of knowledge — and tell the rest.

Try it on one page

Take a single page of your own draft. Mark every sentence that tells the reader what to think or feel. Resist rewriting all of them; that is how a page becomes four. Instead, choose the one that matters most — the moment the scene turns on — and rewrite only that as a piece of action, dialogue or physical detail.

Then read the page again and notice how much more the reader now understands. One shown moment per scene is often plenty. The rest of the telling is still doing its quiet, necessary work: carrying the reader from one moment to the next without making them wade.

Photo: StockSnap / Pixabay